iFDG 767-200

 

review

The Boeing 767 is a medium to long haul wide-body commercial passenger jet aircraft. It can carry between 181 and 375 passengers over a distance of max. 12,200 Km. The 767 was launched to replace the 707 and fill the gap between the 727/757 and the 747. The first 767, the -200 variant, entered service with United Airlines in 1982. Blended winglets are available as a retrofit to increase fuel efficiency and range.

The iFDG Boeing 767-200 is a nice looking model, but a little outdated (2003). Most of the standard features are present, like opening passenger and cargo doors, wingviews, etc. There are various models available like RR, GE and PW engine variants. The flight dynamics are not bad, but some other things about this model are: The horizontal stabilizer is not moving while the trim is in progress and the landing gear is sinking into the runway while landing.


















--

Added on: 07/29/2008 • Views: 2848 • Downloads: 205 • User rating: 3.67 (3 Votes)
 

the good

  • Frame rate friendly
  •  

    the bad

  • Outdated model
  • The stabilizer trim is not animated on the exterior
  • The main landing gear is sinking into the runway on touchdown
  •  

    specifications

    License
    : Freeware
    Panel
    : No
    Virtual Cockpit
    : No
    Wingview
    : Yes
    Sound
    : No
    Developed for
    : FS2002
    Compatibility
    : FS2004 FSX
    Wingflex
    : Yes, gear compression based
    Landing gear
    : Realistic, but sinking into runway
    Rudder effect
    : Realistic
     

    frame rate index

    FS2004
    :
    FSX
    :
     

    Links

    notes

    -

    Comments

    Posted By: kyle

    on 04/03/2009 at 18:56:43

    hello I just got the ifdg 767-200 on fsx and I cant get the jetways to come to the plane, could I get some help so the jetways actually come? Thank You
    Posted By: Chris

    on 04/04/2009 at 5:14:41

    Well I am not sure if anyone has configured the iFDG 767 for the FSX jetways. This is a quite old aircraft and most people prefer the Posky 767.
    Posted By: kyle

    on 04/04/2009 at 19:31:13

    The posky 767-200 v4 doesnt work on fsx so its kinda hard to get a fully fsx compatible 767-200. Anyways ill just stick with it. Thats alright

    Add a Comment

    Your name

    Your E-Mail

    Comment

    Please press the button only once. Your comment will show after it has been approved by the moderator.

    Formatting:
    [b]bold[/b], [i]italic[/i], [u]underline[/u], [url]https://www.yoursite.com[/url]

    Rate this aircraft

    Lowest Highest